housing

Private developers get £100m from housing fund but build just 700 affordable homes

A £150m housing fund has awarded more than £100m to private firms, prompting claims the Scottish Government is “doling out millions of pounds” to developers at the expense of affordable housing and climate change.

The Building Scotland Fund (BSF) is the precursor to the Scottish National Investment Bank (SNIB) which is required to finance action on climate change and tackle inequalities.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the bank, which is due to start lending this autumn, would be central to a green new deal for Scotland.

The BSF was announced in 2018, when ministers committed to investing £150 million in housing for a three-year period up until 2021.

More than two-thirds of that sum has already been allocated, but new data has revealed that so far all the cash has gone to private developers, with only 700 homes allocated for affordable housing.

The data was obtained by Friends of the Earth Scotland which claims that ethical or environmental checks imposed on proposed housing projects were “limited or non-existent”.

Scottish Government failing to meet rural housing targets

In reply, however, the Scottish Government said it is committed to delivering 50,000 affordable homes and its affordable housing programme is focused on “enhancing energy efficiency”.

Using freedom of information law, Friends of the Earth asked the Scottish Government to provide the criteria used to screen clients and projects financed by the BSF. The environmental group also asked for details of measures incorporated into the design of each project to reduce environmental impacts.

The Scottish Government response revealed that some projects had no measures or they were to be confirmed. This prompted Friends of the Earth to argue that the initial application process for the Fund was flawed because it did not include specific questions relating to the environmental and social benefits of proposed housing projects.

Projects funded to date include an exclusive new build of 35 family homes at a site in Kinross-shire, near Dochrie Hill, which has “spectacular views” across Loch Leven. The development received a £4.6m loan.

Another private project funded is the conversion of a former 18th-century castle in the Borders into 11 apartments. It received a £1.64m loan in March 2020 to convert the former Castle Venlaw Hotel in Peebles, which dates back to 1872.

Another developer received £1.6m in October 2019 to convert a former steading into eight new homes in Perth and Kinross.

Stewart Milne Group – one of the UK’s largest house builders – received £12m in May 2019 to build 300 homes over three council areas in Renfrewshire and the Lothians, but there will be no affordable housing.

Edinburgh property group Sigma was given a £30m a credit facility in April 2019. It plans to build “between 1500 and 1800 houses for rent” but none will be classified as affordable housing. The Scottish Government said of this project: “These homes will be in suburban settings across the central belt of Scotland, suitable for couples and families. This is a Build to Rent (BTR) project, meaning that the homes will be professionally managed.”

The Scottish Government can and must put in place strong ethical investment checks to stop the Scottish National Investment Bank from lending to profiteers and polluters and ensure it focuses its finance on projects that benefit communities and the planet. Ric Lander, Friends of the Earth Scotland

Ric Lander, campaigner with Friends of the Earth Scotland, said “people should be angry” to learn that the Scottish Government is “doling out millions of pounds in finance to building developers” who are providing little benefit to communities or the environment.

He added: “Scotland urgently needs a recovery from covid-19 that prioritises people and the planet over corporate profits. Public and co-operative housing, renewable heat networks, home energy efficiency and zero carbon transport are ready for investment. Such programmes that would create jobs, protect our climate and make our lives better, but they are not being prioritised.”

Commenting on the launch of the SNIB, he said these “revelations open up serious questions” about how ethical an investor the new bank will be.

“The Scottish Government can and must put in place strong ethical investment checks to stop the Scottish National Investment Bank from lending to profiteers and polluters and ensure it focuses its finance on projects that benefit communities and the planet,” Lander continued.

Scottish families priced out of rental homes by UK austerity policies

Megan Bishop, a spokesperson for Living Rent, voiced concern over an apparent lack of affordable housing in projects supported to date. She claimed this shows an “ongoing neglect by the Scottish Government” to support “genuinely affordable housing” through its new fund.

Bishop added: “The Building Scotland Fund, which was launched as a shining precursor to the Scottish National Investment Bank, has less than 25 per cent of its homes providing affordable and social rent.

“Given Scotland’s soaring rents in most of its urban centres and the current reality of tenants accumulating arrears and being under the threat of evictions, the Scottish Government needs to streamline its funding to building affordable and publicly controlled housing. The government stands at a turning point: to relaunch its economy, it can either invest in its communities or it can continue to support private profits.”

Scottish Greens co-leader and finance spokesperson Patrick Harvie argued that the point of establishing a Scottish National Investment Bank should be to “strategically invest in the future of a fairer, greener Scotland”.

He added: “It’s therefore deeply disappointing that its precursor the Building Scotland Fund is propping up the failed old ways of the past. We need low carbon housing and investment in green jobs, but there’s little evidence of that here.”

“There has to come a point when the Scottish Government stops just talking a good game when it comes to tackling the climate emergency and building a wellbeing economy and starts to put its money where its mouth is.”

However, a Scottish Government spokesperson defended the BSF’s projects and said that all applications since October 2019 have been assessed on new criterion.

“New investment conditions were introduced to the Building Scotland Fund in October 2019, including a requirement for all financed new homes to meet energy performance certificate B as a minimum standard, and for applicants to demonstrate their commitment to key fair work criteria.

“Our affordable housing supply programme is focused on enhancing energy efficiency with subsidies available for new council and housing association homes which meet a greener standard. During 2019-20 over 90 percent of the new build homes approved for housing associations and councils met this standard.”

“The 2019 Climate Change Act enshrines in law our commitment to a just transition to net zero – in which wellbeing, fair work and social justice are prioritised and no-one is left behind. This year’s Programme for Government makes clear that our commitment to tackling the twin challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss is unwavering.

A spokeswoman for Stewart Milne Homes said: “Stewart Milne Homes confirms it has received a loan of £12million through the Building Scotland Fund to accelerate the delivery of 300 much-needed new homes within Scotland.

“Through this investment, Stewart Milne Homes will deliver energy efficient, low-carbon new homes set within sustainable communities. All homes will meet energy performance certificate B as a minimum. Stewart Milne Group is committed to Scottish Government’s Scottish Business Pledge.”

Sigma did not respond to our request for a comment.

Good journalism changes things

The Ferret was established in 2015 with a mission to publish fearless, high quality journalism.

Since then thousands of people have joined us. We hope you will too.

We're a cooperative with places reserved for both our writers and subscribers on the board.

We're independently regulated, and work hard to keep our overheads down. This means that all the money we get from our subscribers is invested directly in original public interest news.

We're avowedly non-partisan so we can treat everyone fairly. We don't publish click bait and we don't do favours for political parties or powerful vested interests. We do help to change things.

Or see your other subscription options.

Got a story idea?

Tell us what you'd like us to write about next and vote up the best ideas.