Journalists from across the media have accused the Scottish Government of failing to keep records and frustrating freedom of information (FoI) law.

Twenty-three online, broadcast and newspaper journalists have signed a joint letter of concern to MSPs who are about to choose Scotland’s new information watchdog. The letter, copied to the FoI minister Derek Mackay, warns that ministers’ much-vaunted commitments to openness and transparency are “under great doubt”.

The letter has been welcomed by the acting Scottish Information Commissioner, who says that it highlights “potentially serious breaches” of statutory duties. It has also been backed by the National Union of Journalists (NUJ), union chapels at the BBC and STV and FoI campaigners.

Amongst the signatories are ten journalists from The Ferret and CommonSpace, which are both publishing the letter in full. It has also been signed by experienced FoI reporters at the Guardian, The Times, The Telegraph, Daily Record, Daily Mail, The Herald, Sunday Herald, Sunday Post and others.

The letter highlights flaws in the way the Scottish Government and its agencies respond to FoI requests. “We have become increasingly concerned about the way in which the legislation is being interpreted and implemented,” it says.

The letter cites examples of legal deadlines being breached, long delays, and requests being blocked or refused for “tenuous” reasons. It accuses the Scottish Government of “taking control” of information requests to agencies, and of using special advisers to screen requests for political damage.

“Some of these experiences raise questions of whether information requests by journalists are being treated and managed differently, even though the legislation requires all requests to be handled equally and without favour or prejudice,” the letter says.

“We are increasingly told the information we are seeking is not held where ministerial meetings with other bodies or individuals to discuss government policy are said to be informal, minutes are not taken, and records are not kept. Correspondence and reports that should be available seem not to exist.”

The letter adds: “This raises the question of whether Scottish ministers and civil servants now have a practice of not recording information that would previously have been recorded.”

The journalists’ collective experience casts doubt on the Scottish Government’s promise to be a “beacon of transparency”, the letter argues. It highlights fierce criticisms of the government’s FoI record by the former Scottish Information Commissioner, Rosemary Agnew, in an interview with The Ferret in April.

The letter urges ministers immediately to act within the spirit and letter of FoI law, and calls for a review of the Scottish Government’s policies for dealing with FoI requests.

It concludes: “We believe that review should also look closely at the question of whether the legislation should include a duty to record on government officials, advisers and ministers, particularly when meeting with outside bodies, individuals or lobbyists to discuss government policy.”

Agnew stepped down as information commissioner on 30 April to start work as the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman dealing with complaints against public bodies. A committee of five MSPs, including the Scottish Parliament’s Presiding Officer Ken Macintosh and the Green MSP Andy Wightman, is due to interview candidates to succeed her on 5 June.

In the interim the acting Scottish Information Commissioner is Margaret Keyse, head of enforcement in the commissioner’s office in St Andrews. “I welcome the letter,” she said.

“The journalists’ experience points to potentially serious breaches of a statutory duty. The commissioner can investigate these breaches, but only if they are appealed to us.”

The commissioner had a long track record of taking a strong line on FoI breaches, she stated. Agnew had set out concerns about failures to respond in 2014, and enforceable decisions had been issued when public agencies failed to respond to requests from journalists.

Keyse added: “Where we receive more than five appeals about a single authority failing to respond to requests on time, we take action under our enforcement policy, requiring it to take steps to improve compliance. We are currently undertaking this work with the Scottish Government.”

Paul Holleran, national organiser for NUJ Scotland, also applauded the journalists’ intervention. “The NUJ has been concerned for some time about the changing attitude towards FoI in Scotland, particularly in respect of Scottish Government treatment of the issue,” he said.

“It appears to me there has been a change in the culture of FoI engagement by some ministers. The approach to dealing with responses is dramatically different than the heady days of its introduction and early implementation of the FoI act.”

The Campaign for Freedom of Information in Scotland maintained that the work of independent journalists was essential in holding government and public sector agencies to account. “The public have the right to form opinions but they need access to accurate and up to date information to give that right meaning,” said one of the campaign’s founding members, David Goldberg.

“We need journalists probing behind the headlines and asking questions of public interest to ensure open and accountable publicly funded services – and their rights as well as their role need to be respected.”

The Scottish Government insisted that its records were maintained in accordance with all relevant records’ management legislation and practice. “Scotland has the most open and far-reaching freedom of information laws in the UK,” said a spokeswoman.

“We take our responsibility for FoI seriously and in the large majority of cases we respond on time and in full. At the same time, the increasing volume and complexity of some requests can prove time consuming, and has the potential to seriously impact on the work of government.”

The spokeswoman pointed out that the number of FoI requests was steadily increasing. There were more than 2,000 requests last year, and more received in the first three months of 2017 than in the whole of 2007.

She added: “We are working with the commissioner to ensure we continue to provide information in as timely a way as possible, while continuing to look for opportunities to proactively release information.”

The joint letter from journalists

A story on the journalists’ letter was also published by CommonSpace.

Photo thank to Roger H. Goun via CC by 2.0.


  1. rob says:

    This story was followed up by the BBC:

    It also prompted the following statements from Scottish Labour and the Scottish Liberal Democrats:

    Commenting on the joint FOI letter from journalists to Derek Mackay, Scottish Labour’s Culture spokesperson Lewis Macdonald MSP said:

    “This is a welcome and important intervention from some of Scotland’s most experienced journalists.

    “The SNP often trumpets its alleged openness and transparency, but clearly it is falling wide of the mark.

    “Labour introduced Freedom of Information legislation to ensure government was accessible to the public and journalists as far as possible.

    “SNP ministers must now take action to ensure their government is as open and transparent as they profess – or else public concern that they have something to hide will only grow.”

    Scottish Liberal Democrat business manager Mike Rumbles MSP today demanded the SNP Government become more open and transparent after over twenty journalists signed a letter accusing it of frustrating freedom of information (FOI) law and failing to keep records.

    Commenting, Mr Rumbles said:

    “It is worrying to see so many respected journalists feel the need to sign such a letter. The law is clear about what information the Scottish Government has a duty to disclose but it is being flouted time and again. Minutes of meetings aren’t being taken to ensure there is no paper trail on what was discussed and how decisions are reached. The public is being cheated.

    “Trying to get information out of the Scottish Government is like wrestling with jelly. Even the freedom of information commissioner has condemned its approach as being unacceptable and rude.

    “We have seen attempts to conceal non-existent legal advice on an independent Scotland’s EU membership, costs of luxury hotels for a trip to a gold tournament in Chicago withheld and the curbing of communications relating to the SNP’s plans to centralise HIE.

    “SNP ministers may want to keep working in shadows but Scottish Liberal Democrats are determined to strengthen and expand the public’s right to information.”

  2. rob says:

    The Labour MSP Neil Findlay has also lodged a motion in the Scottish Parliament backing the concerns expressed by journalists:

    Leading Journalists Criticise the Scottish Government over FOISA

    That the Parliament notes with great concern the letter from whom it understands are 23 prominent Scottish journalists to the selection panel for the appointment of the Scottish Information Commissioner, which was published on 1 June 2017 by The Ferret and Common Space and details what they argue are the failures of the Scottish Government and its agencies in relation to the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA); understands that it suggests that the application of FOISA by ministers and officials is questionable at best and, at worst, implies a culture and practice of secrecy and cover up, including, it believes, through routinely avoiding sharing information, often through not recording or taking minutes of meetings that are attended by ministers or senior civil servants; considers that this flies in the face of what it sees as the Scottish Government’s much-vaunted assessment of itself as open and transparent, including through the Open Government Partnership Scottish National Action Plan and its role as one of 15 pioneer members of the Open Government Partnership’s inaugural International Subnational Government Programme and legislation such as the Public Records (Scotland) Act 2011; understands that the Scottish Government introduced its Record Management Plan to comply with the 2011 Act; notes the view that the journalists’ criticism of FOISA shows that it is time to have a review of whether the legislation remains robust or has been diminished, whether it should be extended and strengthened and whether elements of it are still appropriate, such as the level set for the cost exemption, whereby the Scottish Government may refuse to provide information if the cost of doing so exceeds £600, a figure that hasn’t been updated since FOISA came into force, and further notes the view that, by doing so, this would ensure that people in Lothian and across the country who use their freedom of information rights could be confident that FOISA would be improved and applied in a way that was consistent with the spirit intended when the law was established.

  3. rob says:

    The Scottish Parliament has now confirmed that there will be a debate after 5pm on Tuesday 13 June on the motion by Labour MSP Neil Findlay expressing “great concern” about the joint letter from 23 journalists criticising the handling of freedom of information requests by the Scottish Government. The motion has so far been supported by two Conservative MSPs, Adam Tomkins and Jamie Greene, the Liberal Democrat MSP Tavish Scott, the Green MSP Andy Wightman, and eight Labour MSPs.

  4. The Open Government Network for Scotland has published an open letter, backed by a range of voluntary sector signatories, calling on the Scottish Parliament Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee to investigate the operation of Freedom of Information legislation in Scotland.

    In the letter they say that a range of stakeholders have raised issues with the operation of FOI laws and suggest that: “These concerns are at a sufficient level, and represent a significantly wide array of society that we believe the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 should be examined by the Scottish Parliament’s Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee.”

    You can read the whole letter at this link.

Add your contribution at

6 more replies