A formal complaint has been sent to the Conservative Party over its rebranding of an official Twitter account as an independent fact checking service during a TV debate between Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn.

The move to change the name of the Tory press office account @CCHQPress to “factcheckUK” while Johnson and Corbyn went head-to-head on television has attracted widespread criticism that the public was deceived.

A formal letter of complaint has now been to sent to Tory Party HQ by the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP).

It was addressed to James Cleverly MP, chairman of the Conservative Party, and it accuses the Tories of “raising the spectre of state-sponsored misinformation and the deliberate undermining of truth.”

CILIP’s chief executive, Nick Poole, complained “in the strongest possible terms” about @CCHQPress being rebranded during the televised leaders debate. “Rarely has it been more important that all political parties respect the role of evidence and accountability in public life,” he wrote.

“Your party’s actions in misrepresenting itself as a legitimate fact checking service cross a line which ought never to be crossed – raising the spectre of state-sponsored misinformation and the deliberate undermining of truth and accountability which should have no place in British politics.”

Poole stressed that the complaint was not party political. CILIP has been campaigning since 2017 for all parties to make a clear commitment to evidence and accountability.

He said: “We believe that it is the right of every citizen to receive accurate and open information, and the responsibility of public authorities to ensure that they are providing it – including political parties. We are committed to supporting citizens in finding and making use of accurate information.”

Poole accused the Conservative leadership of failing to “act with honesty and probity and in a manner which upholds the reputation and values of the Conservative Party”. This was likely to diminish public trust, he said.

The Conservative Party in the UK did not respond to a request to comment, and the Scottish Conservatives also declined to provide a statement.

Full Fact, an independent fact-checking charity, said the party’s account should not be allowed to be used in this way and that it had complained to Twitter.

“It is inappropriate and misleading for the Conservative press office to rename their Twitter account factcheckUK during this debate. Please do not mistake it for an independent factchecking service,” Full Fact said.

In a statement Twitter said the Conservatives had misled the public and it would take “decisive corrective action” if a similar stunt was attempted again.

“Twitter is committed to facilitating healthy debate throughout the UK general election,” said a spokesperson.

However, foreign secretary, Dominic Raab, defended the move on Wednesday and told BBC Breakfast that “no one gives a toss about the social media cut and thrust”. Senior Conservative cabinet minister, Michael Gove, also refused to apologise for the rebranding on C4 News.

The Ferret has run an independent fact checking service in Scotland since 2o17. Our fact checks are all here.

At 10.10 on 29 November 2019 the headline was changed to remove the accusation of “state-sponsored misinformation” and the fourth paragraph was accordingly modified, following a complaint from a reader.

The complaint to the Conservative Party in full

Letter Conservativehq nov201 (Text)


Good journalism changes things

If, like us, you understand the power of a fearless, independent media, please consider supporting The Ferret.

The Ferret is a unique media project powered by people like you. We have no ads, and we're not owned by shadowy hedge funds or off-shore oligarchs. Instead we're a cooperative with places reserved for our writers and subscribers on the board.

We're avowedly non-partisan so we can treat everyone fairly. We don't publish click bait and we don't do favours for political parties or powerful vested interests. We do help to change things.

£9 per month

Or see your other subscription options.

Got a story idea?

Tell us what you'd like us to write about next and vote up the best ideas.

Add comment

E-mail is already registered on the site. Please use the Login form or enter another.

You entered an incorrect username or password

Sorry that something went wrong, repeat again!
We welcome strong opinions and diverse perspectives, but please be kind, considered and respectful when you post.