Nicola Sturgeon once in a generation

Claim Sturgeon signed ‘once in a generation’ indyref agreement is Mostly False

The Scottish Conservatives have a new leader, Douglas Ross, who has promised to “leave the old divisions” of nationalism in the past.

In an interview with the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland programme on 3 August, he made it clear he believed that a second independence referendum should not be held, as the First Minister had committed to the first vote being a “once in a generation” opportunity.

Nicola Sturgeon did sign that agreement with the UK and Scottish Governments that it [a Scottish independence referendum] would be once in a generation. Douglas Ross

Ferret Fact Service looked at this claim and found it Mostly False.

Evidence

The debate around a second Scottish independence referendum is not going away. Recent polls have shown consistent support for Scotland breaking away from the UK, and the SNP is currently projected for significant gains in the next Holyrood election in 2021.

While the SNP have campaigned with a commitment to hold a second referendum in their recent election manifestos, the timing and mandate for another vote has been called into question.

Much debate surrounds the term “once in a generation” which was used by SNP politicians during the run up to the vote in 2014, with some arguing that this means that a second referendum should not be held just six years after the first.

How has polling changed on Scottish independence since 2014?

Douglas Ross claimed in his BBC Good Morning Scotland interview that Nicola Sturgeon signed an agreement with the UK and Scottish Governments that the 2014 referendum would be a “once in a generation” vote.

In her role as deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon signed a document, known as the Edinburgh agreement, between the UK and Scottish Governments on 15 October 2012. The agreement set out how the two governments would work together to ensure the 2014 independence referendum could take place.

This document did not commit to the referendum being a “once in a generation” event, but did commit them to ensuring that the referendum result would “deliver a fair test and a decisive expression of the views of people in Scotland and a result that everyone will respect”.

Ferret Fact Service could find no evidence of Nicola Sturgeon signing an agreement that a referendum would be a “once in a generation” vote.

However, senior SNP figures, including then First Minister Alex Salmond, said that the referendum would be a “once in a generation opportunity” for Scotland.

The Scottish Government’s 2013 white paper, Scotland’s Future, which made the case for Scottish independence, also defined the referendum as a “once in a generation opportunity”.

In the Q&A section of the document, The Scottish Government answers the question “If Scotland votes No, will there be another referendum on independence at a later date?”

The Scottish Government’s response was: “The Edinburgh Agreement states that a referendum must be held by the end of 2014. There is no arrangement in place for another referendum on independence.

“It is the view of the current Scottish Government that a referendum is a once-in-a-generation opportunity. This means that only a majority vote for Yes in 2014 would give certainty that Scotland will be independent.”

Before the 2014 vote, Nicola Sturgeon herself repeatedly called the referendum a “once in a lifetime” or “once in a generation” opportunity, such as in an interview with the BBC’s Daily Politics, where she said: “The SNP have always said that in our view these kind of referendums are ‘once in a generation’ events.”

How long is a generation?

There has been confusion and disagreement over what a generation means in political terms.

It has been argued that the use of the term is a rhetorical flourish intended to encourage voters not to miss a chance to support independence.

Variations of the term “once in a generation” have been used by many politicians. For example, both Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn used the phrase to describe the 2019 general election, despite the next election being held in 2024 at the latest.

In an interview with the BBC’s Andrew Marr prior to the 2014 referendum, Alex Salmond gave an example of a “political generation” as the time between the 1979 and 1997 Scottish devolution referendums (18 years).

There has been polling on the issue, done by YouGov in 2017. The results showed that 39 per cent of Scots polled felt a generation is either 20 or 25 years, while 13 per cent say 30 years and 10 per cent say 10 years.

The survey found that 28 per cent of Yes voters felt a generation lasts fewer than 20 years, compared with just 14 per cent of No voters.

Ferret Fact Service verdict: Mostly False

Douglas Ross is incorrect in his claim that Nicola Sturgeon signed an agreement that the Scottish independence referendum would be a “once in a generation” vote. The ‘Edinburgh agreement’ that allowed Scotland to hold the 2014 vote did not mention any timescale for another referendum. However, Sturgeon and then-First Minister Alex Salmond repeatedly stated in interviews that they felt the vote was a “once in a generation” opportunity.

This claim is Mostly False

Ferret Fact Service (FFS) is a non-partisan fact checker, and a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network fact-checkers’ code of principles. All the sources used in our checks are publicly available and the FFS fact-checking methodology can be viewed here. Want to suggest a fact check? Go to ideas.theferret.scot, email us at factcheck@theferret.scot or join our Facebook group.

Good journalism changes things

The Ferret was established in 2015 with a mission to publish fearless, high quality journalism.

Since then thousands of people have joined us. We hope you will too.

We're a cooperative with places reserved for both our writers and subscribers on the board.

We're independently regulated, and work hard to keep our overheads down. This means that all the money we get from our subscribers is invested directly in original public interest news.

We're avowedly non-partisan so we can treat everyone fairly. We don't publish click bait and we don't do favours for political parties or powerful vested interests. We do help to change things.

Or see your other subscription options.

Got a story idea?

Tell us what you'd like us to write about next and vote up the best ideas.





To read more you need to login with your Ferret account.

Only Ferret members get unlimited access to our stories.

Not a member yet? Join now.