Radioactive waste wrongly sent to Hunterston nuclear plant

Investigations have been launched into how radioactive waste ended up in a transport container at Hunterston nuclear power station in breach of environmental rules.

The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) has disclosed that unauthorised radioactive “debris” was found in a supposedly empty fuel flask returned to the North Ayrshire plant from the Sellafield nuclear complex in Cumbria.

Sellafield described the waste as a “mis-consignment”, while Hunterston’s operator, EDF Energy, said it was a “non-compliance”. They are both now investigating where the waste came from, as is Sepa.

Critics have accused the nuclear industry of “mismanagement”, and reiterated calls for Hunterston’s two reactors to stay shut. The industry said that there was “no risk to the environment or the public”.

The Ferret reported on 9 March that Hunterston had breached radiation safety rules and suffered five other problems with its safety systems. The UK government’s safety watchdog, the Office for Nuclear Regulation, said that Hunterston had “failed to adequately account for” radioactive materials last October.

Concerns after six safety incidents at Hunterston nuclear plant

When Hunterston B nuclear power station was operational, highly radioactive fuel burnt in its two reactors was regularly transported to Sellafield for storage. One reactor ran for less than four months in 2019, but both are now shut awaiting safety assessments of proliferating cracks in their graphite cores.

The large flasks used for the spent fuel shipments are meant to be returned empty from Sellafield to Hunterston. But on 23 January EDF told Sepa that “it had found debris in a fuel flask received from Sellafield.”

Sepa reported the incident to a Hunterston stakeholder meeting in Seamill near West Kilbride on 5 March. The debris was radioactive waste which Hunterston was “not authorised” to receive under the Environmental Authorisations (Scotland) Regulations, Sepa said.

“Although there appears to be no environmental impact from the receipt of this waste, it represents a contravention of the station’s permit.”

EDF said it reported discovering the radioactive debris “promptly” to Sepa. “The material which arrived at Hunterston B in the bottom of a fuel flask from Sellafield remained safely in the flask while on site and did not cause any environmental harm,” added an EDF spokesperson.

“The arrival of the material means there has been a non-compliance with the site’s environmental permit and EDF is working with the regulator and Sellafield to establish how this situation can be managed in the future.”

Sellafield, which is owned and run by the UK government, had also informed regulators of the incident. “An empty transport flask, that was being returned to Hunterston B site in Scotland from Sellafield, was found to contain a small amount of graphite debris,” said a Sellafield spokesperson.

“The flask is specifically designed to safely transport spent fuel and there was no risk to the environment or the public from this transport. We are investigating the cause of this mis-consignment.”

The amount, level and type of radioactivity found have not been disclosed. According to EDF, the material did not come from the core of Hunterston reactor four while it was operating between August and December 2019.

Friends of the Earth Scotland called for Hunterston’s reactors never to be restarted. “Hunterston’s radioactive woes continue to mount with another episode of mismanagement within the nuclear industry,” said the environmental group’s director, Dr Richard Dixon.

“Nuclear power was supposed to be a high-tech, space age industry run by expert but recent performance makes it very hard to think that the industry is anything but dangerous.”

The Edinburgh-based nuclear consultant and critic, Peter Roche, urged Sepa to complete its investigation as quickly as possible. “If it’s getting into fuel flasks it could be getting elsewhere,” he said.

“We can’t have Sellafield accidentally distributing radioactive debris around the country.”

According to the Scottish Greens, Sellafield had some “serious questions” to answer. “Hunterston has no shortage of safety issues of its own without other nuclear site operators adding to the problems,” said the party’s West Scotland MSP, Ross Greer.

“These incidents are constant reminders that the problems with nuclear energy just aren’t worth it, especially with the abundance of clean, renewable alternative sources here in Scotland. Decommissioning Hunterston will provide jobs for its workforce for years to come.”

A spokesperson for the Scottish Environment Protection Agency said: “We are aware of an issue relating to debris found in a fuel flask at Hunterston B power station, which appears to be in contravention of site permit conditions. We are investigating the matter, but are confident there is no risk to public health.”

The Ferret revealed on 1 March that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) was planning to increase discharges of radioactive waste into the Firth of Clyde by up to 50 times. The waste comes from the reactors that drive the submarines based at Faslane and from the processing of Trident nuclear warheads at Coulport in Argyll.

The MoD plans are the subject of a public consultation being conducted by Sepa. The consultation is due to end on 13 March.

Faslane to dump up to 50 times more radioactive waste in the Clyde

The report on radioactive waste at Hunterston by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency

Hunterston B SSG SEPA Report (Text)

Photo thanks to Chris McKenna (Thryduulf) via CC BY-SA.

  1. This situation of using Scotland as a nuclear waste dump, is going from the sublime to the ridiculous now.
    Regarding the re-opening of Hunterston B, the grid seemed to cope just fine whilst these reactors were closed down, I do not recall frequent power cuts during peak demand times!
    This therefore shows that a foreign power company, is deliberately putting Scottish lives at risk, purely for reasons of excess profits. This should never even be considered by government. Hunterston should be immediately shut down and dismantled.
    Sure theu’re telling us that the other safety issues on site were not nuclear related, and there is no need for concern, but that actually makes things worse, if they are capable of making so many “mistakes” on basic health and safety regulations and issues, then they are incapable of ensuring safety with the more serios concerns, human error is human error, whether it be basic HSE regulatons or nuclear related.
    Can they be trusted to safely have the plant dismantled, and disposed of when it is finally shut down for good, or alternatively, once they have made the profits to satisfy their shareholders, are they simply going to walk away, shrugging their shoulders, saying we do not have the money required to dismantle a plant that now has so many cracks, that were well beyond UK’s acceptable standards?
    Regarding a flask containing radioactive materials being sent to Hunterston from Sellafield, I would not put it past this Government and Alex Boris DePfeffel Johnson, to have deliberately arranged for this to happen, to judge the public outcry, before he goes ahead and starts dumping 50 times more nuclear waste into the firth of Clyde.
    That flask containing nuclear waste they sent to Hunterston, should instead, have been sent to the Thames, and dumped in the river just adjacent to Westminster, in order to judge their levels of public outcry or acceptability, of being used as a nuclear dumping ground!

  2. I have concerns regarding the air space above Hunterston as there are regular flights of light aircraft passing over it. Who is responsible to regulate this? After all the Cluther and 911 did happen. What safety measures are in place in the event of a terrorist attack or accident?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hi! To read more you need to login.
Not a member yet? Join our co-operative now to get unlimited access.
You can join using Direct Debit, payment card or Paypal. Cancel at any time. If you are on a low-income you may be eligible for a free sponsored membership. Having trouble logging in? Try here.
Hi! To read more you need to login.
Not a member yet?
Hi! You can login using the form below.
Not registered yet?
Having trouble logging in? Try here.