Bahraini human rights activists have called on Scotch whisky brand Johnnie Walker to stop sponsoring Formula One car racing.
The campaigners say the Bahraini Grand Prix, which takes place on 30 and 31 March, is used by the country’s ruling monarchy to whitewash human rights abuses.
One activist, Najah Yusuf, is currently serving a three-year prison sentence in Bahrain after her Facebook posts criticised the 2017 Grand Prix and the Bahraini regime.
Lily Chamberlain, advocacy associate of the Bahrain Institute of Rights and Democracy, told The Ferret: “Johnnie Walker’s glamorous reputation and immediately recognisable logo are a boon to Bahrain’s oppressive government, who use corporate sponsorships to distract from their dire human rights record.”
“The detention and sexual assault of activist Najah Yusuf is a testament to Bahrain’s intolerance for criticism and dissent,” she added.
“As the most widely distributed brand of blended Scotch whisky in the world, Johnnie Walker, should refuse to participate in the sport-washing of Bahrain’s human rights abuses by ending their sponsorship of Formula One.”
Amnesty International urged Johnnie Walker and all companies to adhere to United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Democracy and human rights campaigners in Bahrain have long criticised the Bahrain Grand Prix. They say it provides legitimacy and good publicity for Bahrain’s autocratic ruling family.
The next year, the race was reinstated despite criticism from human rights groups. Protestor, Salah Abbas, and citizen journalist, Ahmed Ismail Hassan al-Samadi, were both killed during anti-government protests leading up to the race.
There have been protests against the race every year since then and, in April 2017, Najah Yusuf was arrested after she called for the Grand Prix to be cancelled and for those arrested for campaigning against it to be released.
After being arrested, Yusuf says she was “relentlessly interrogated for four days”. Her police interrogators sexually assaulted her and threatened to kill her son if she did not unlock her phone, she said.
A Bahraini government spokesperson said: “Najah Yusuf’s conviction does not relate to Bahrain’s Formula One Grand Prix. Any suggestion that she was convicted of a related offence is categorically incorrect.”
The spokesperson added: “She was charged and subsequently convicted by a court of terror offences. Furthermore, Najah Yusuf’s defence did not claim during her trial that her right to free speech had been infringed.
“Peaceful protests of any kind are protected by Bahrain’s constitution and do not constitute a crime.”
When asked if Diageo representatives would be attending the race and hosting clients, the spokesperson declined to comment.
Formula One had not replied to a request for comment at the time of publication but have previously defended their involvement with Bahrain. Campaigners had been “supportive of private actions and next steps we are taking, that we outlined to them when we met,” a spokesperson told the Guardian on 27 March.
“Furthermore campaigners accepted our offer to keep some of the actions we were taking private, as they had raised concerns about any public dialogue. We all agreed it would be unhelpful to comment further publicly at this time.
“We’ve kept to those commitments, in line with our commitments to respecting internationally-recognised human rights everywhere, and engaging with promoters to ensure nobody faces punitive action over freedom of expression.”
Liberal Democrat, Lord Scriven, said he had met with Formula One and was pleased they had agreed to investigate Yusuf’s case and report back to him.
“The case of Najah Yousif and her imprisonment linked to Formula One is clear,” he told The Ferret. “I await their feedback and hopefully action. If they don’t, then I will not hesitate to turn the campaign onto Formula One sponsors, teams and individual drivers.”
This story was updated at 12 noon on 29 March 2019 to include comments from Lord Scriven, and at 14.15 on the same day to add a comment from Amnesty International.